天美传媒

Body-worn cameras; Healthcare; Forensic nursing; Ethical implications; Patient privacy; Emergency departments; Mental health; Policy frameworks; Evidence collection; Patient trust

Introduction

Body-worn cameras (BWCs) are increasingly considered for healthcare settings, presenting a complex array of perceived benefits alongside significant challenges. An integrative review synthesizes existing evidence, highlighting critical ethical dilemmas, pervasive privacy concerns for both patients and staff, and the potential impact these devices could have on patient trust and overall care delivery. This research underscores the fundamental necessity for clear policy frameworks and robust training before implementing BWCs to ensure their deployment is both effective and ethically sound. [1] The application of BWCs within emergency departments (EDs), a key setting for forensic nursing, has been systematically reviewed. Motivations for BWC adoption include reducing aggression and improving incident documentation, though implementation is often fraught with challenges related to staff acceptance, patient privacy, and data management. Successful deployment requires comprehensive stakeholder engagement and clear guidelines to maximize benefits while effectively mitigating inherent risks in this complex environment. [2] Patient and public perspectives on BWCs further complicate their integration, revealing a nuanced interplay of trust, profound privacy concerns, and perceived safety advantages. While some patients appreciate accountability, others express significant worry about surveillance and the potential erosion of their autonomy. Understanding these diverse viewpoints is crucial for developing BWC policies that meticulously balance safety, evidence collection, and patient-centered care, especially within sensitive forensic contexts. [3] The implications extend uniquely to mental health nursing, where a scoping review identifies challenges such as patient capacity for informed consent, the potential for BWCs to exacerbate paranoia, and their impact on established therapeutic relationships. While BWCs might offer benefits for staff safety and incident documentation, their application in this vulnerable population demands exceptionally careful ethical consideration and tailored policies. [4] Multi-method studies exploring perceptions of BWCs in EDs reinforce these varied attitudes; staff frequently view BWCs as a vital safety measure and aggression deterrent, whereas patients often express concerns about privacy and footage use. This highlights the critical need for transparent communication, prominent signage, and robust data governance to foster trust and ensure BWCs genuinely support effective care and evidence collection. [5] Forensic nursing is recognized as a distinct and evolving specialty, making crucial contributions across various settings to patient care, public health, and the legal system through meticulous documentation and expert testimony. [8] Understanding this foundational role is essential when considering how tools like BWCs might impact forensic practice and evidence integrity. Forensic nurses' experiences testifying as expert witnesses illuminate both the challenges and intrinsic rewards of this pivotal role, describing emotional toll, legal complexities, and the paramount importance of thorough preparation. This underscores the need for specialized training to enhance testimony, which BWC evidence could both augment and complicate. [6] Furthermore, forensic nurses play a critical role in providing comprehensive care to sexual assault survivors. Their responsibilities span from meticulous evidence collection and medical assessment to emotional support and expert testimony, highlighting specialized skills required to navigate sensitive situations, preserve crucial evidence, and advocate effectively. BWC evidence could integrate into or significantly affect this delicate process. [7] The vital integration of forensic nursing services within emergency care settings significantly enhances patient outcomes for victims of violence and trauma, involving rapid assessment, precise evidence collection, and coordination with law enforcement. In this context, BWC footage could provide valuable supplementary, or at times, potentially conflicting, evidence for documenting injuries and statements. [9] Ultimately, the use of BWCs in healthcare is surrounded by intricate ethical and legal implications. A narrative review systematically examines crucial issues such as patient privacy, informed consent, data security, and the potential for BWC footage to be utilized in legal proceedings. The authors emphatically stress the necessity of clear legal frameworks and stringent ethical guidelines to ensure BWCs are deployed responsibly, consistently respecting patient rights while simultaneously aiding in forensic evidence collection and legal testimony. [10] The intersection of BWCs with forensic nursing practice, particularly within sensitive environments, therefore necessitates careful consideration of policies, training, and patient perspectives to ensure beneficial, ethical, and rights-respecting implementation.

Description

Body-worn cameras (BWCs) in healthcare settings present a significant area of research concerning their ethical, legal, and practical implications. An integrative review highlighted that BWCs bring both perceived benefits and considerable challenges, touching upon ethical dilemmas, privacy concerns for patients and staff, and potential impacts on patient trust and care delivery. The review underscores the necessity for clear policy frameworks and robust training prior to implementing BWCs to ensure their effective and ethically sound use [C001].

Specific contexts, like emergency departments (EDs), have been a focal point for BWC implementation, often driven by the desire to reduce aggression and improve incident documentation. However, a systematic review on BWCs in EDs identified substantial challenges, including staff acceptance, patient privacy issues, and data management complexities. Successful integration relies heavily on stakeholder engagement and clear guidelines to maximize benefits and mitigate inherent risks [C002]. Multi-method studies in EDs further revealed varied perceptions, with staff seeing BWCs as safety measures, while patients voice concerns about privacy and footage use. Building trust demands transparent communication, prominent signage, and robust data governance protocols [C005].

The patient and public perspectives on BWCs in healthcare are multifaceted, encompassing trust, privacy, and perceived safety benefits. A mixed-methods systematic review found some patients appreciate accountability and improved care, while others worry about surveillance and autonomy. Recognizing these diverse viewpoints is fundamental for developing BWC policies that balance safety, evidence, and patient-centered care, especially in forensic contexts [C003]. This is critical for vulnerable populations, like mental health settings. A scoping review highlighted unique challenges such as patient capacity for consent, potential to exacerbate paranoia, and impact on therapeutic relationships. While BWCs may offer staff safety benefits, their application in mental health requires meticulous ethical consideration and tailored policies [C004].

Forensic nursing is an evolving specialty contributing to patient care, public health, and the legal system through documentation and expert testimony [C008]. This role is important when evaluating BWC impact on practice and evidence integrity. Forensic nurses provide comprehensive care to sexual assault survivors, encompassing evidence collection, medical assessment, emotional support, and expert testimony [C007]. Their specialized skills are vital for navigating sensitive situations and preserving crucial evidence, with BWC evidence potentially integrating or affecting this process. Integrating forensic nursing in emergency care enhances patient outcomes for victims of violence and trauma, covering rapid assessment, evidence collection, and law enforcement coordination [C009]. BWC footage here could provide supplementary, or conflicting, evidence. Expert witness experiences of forensic nurses underscore legal complexities and emotional toll, indicating BWC evidence could both augment and complicate testimony [C006].

Finally, the overarching ethical and legal implications of using BWCs in healthcare are profound. A narrative review systematically examines issues of patient privacy, informed consent, data security, and the potential use of BWC footage in legal proceedings. This review emphasizes the critical need for clear legal frameworks and ethical guidelines to ensure that BWCs are deployed responsibly, respecting patient rights while potentially aiding in forensic evidence collection and legal testimony [C010]. The intersection of BWC technology with forensic nursing practice, particularly within sensitive environments, demands careful consideration of policies, training, and patient perspectives to achieve a beneficial and ethical implementation that upholds both safety and individual rights.

Conclusion

Body-worn cameras (BWCs) in healthcare settings are a subject of extensive review, revealing both advantages and significant challenges. Research indicates BWCs offer potential benefits such as improved incident documentation and staff safety, particularly in high-stress environments like emergency departments, where they may deter aggression. However, their implementation introduces complex issues surrounding patient and staff privacy, ethical dilemmas, and the impact on patient trust and care delivery. Various studies highlight the need for comprehensive policy frameworks, robust training, and transparent communication. Patient and public perspectives are diverse; some appreciate the accountability and safety, while others express concerns about surveillance and autonomy. This complexity is amplified in specialized areas such as mental health nursing, where considerations like patient consent capacity and the potential for exacerbating paranoia necessitate highly tailored policies. Forensic nursing, a specialty crucial for patient care, public health, and the legal system, involves meticulous documentation and expert testimony, especially for victims of violence and sexual assault. The integration of BWCs could significantly impact forensic evidence collection and courtroom testimony, potentially providing supplementary evidence but also introducing complexities. Overall, the ethical and legal implications, including informed consent, data security, and the use of footage in legal proceedings, demand clear guidelines to ensure BWCs are deployed responsibly while respecting patient rights and the integrity of care.

References

1. Elizabeth S, Laura W, Catherine T (2024) .J Clin Nurs 33:e17062.

   , ,

2. Melita A, Monica H, Naveen J (2024) .Australas Emerg Nurs J 27:101004.

   , ,

3. Elizabeth S, Catherine T, Eleanor W (2024) .BMJ 天美传媒 14:e078518.

   , ,

4. Ellie S, Alexandra T, Eleanor W (2024) .J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs :.

   , ,

5. Eleanor W, Catherine T, Laura W (2024) .Emerg Med J :.

   , ,

6. Theresa RT, Melisa MP, Janet TM (2023) .J Forensic Nurs 19:198-204.

   , Google Scholar,

7. Rebecca C, Janet TM, Nancy S (2020) .Violence Against Women 26:1989-2007.

   , ,

8. Janet TM, Jacquelyn C, Janice K (2020) .J Interpers Violence 35:1269-1293.

   , ,

9. Tina CG, Maureen F, Nancy S (2020) .J Trauma Nurs 27:E10-E14.

   , ,

10. Elham K, Praba V, Annie C (2024) .J Law Med Ethics :.

    , ,