天美传媒

Wearable devices; Forensic nursing; Trauma monitoring; Emergency Medical Services; Physiological data; Data privacy; Ethical considerations; Digital health; Evidence collection; Chain of custody

Introduction

The integration of wearable devices into Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is fundamentally transforming patient care delivery, offering unprecedented capabilities for real-time physiological monitoring, establishing early warning systems for critical changes, and significantly improving communication among care providers. From the perspective of forensic nursing, this technological advancement creates entirely new avenues for meticulous documentation of initial patient states, enabling the collection of objective physiological data as crucial evidence, and providing a clearer understanding of the trajectory of acute trauma from the earliest moments of care [1].

A systematic review has thoroughly examined the effectiveness of wearable devices in the remote monitoring of physiological parameters within civilian trauma populations. This research precisely identifies the current capabilities and inherent limitations of such technology, underscoring how continuous, objective data gathered could be profoundly relevant to forensic investigations. Specifically, it sheds light on changes in patient status over time, helps pinpoint potential contributing factors to injuries, and can accurately delineate the timing of medical interventions, all of which are critical for reconstructive analysis [2].

Beyond individual patient monitoring, a comprehensive systematic review assesses wearable technologies for remote health monitoring across various emergency care settings. This review emphasizes the substantial potential of these devices to significantly enhance both patient assessment and overall management. For forensic nurses, this translates into invaluable insights into the immediate post-trauma period, potentially aiding in the objective documentation of initial injuries and physiological responses. Such detailed and unbiased information becomes exceptionally crucial for fulfilling legal and evidentiary requirements in court proceedings [3].

However, the widespread adoption of digital health technologies, including various wearable devices, invariably introduces critical forensic implications that demand careful consideration. Forensic nursing professionals must address key concerns related to ensuring data integrity, meticulously maintaining a robust chain of custody for digital evidence, safeguarding patient privacy in an increasingly connected environment, and determining the admissibility of digitally collected health data as valid evidence in legal proceedings. This situation urgently calls for the development of clear, standardized protocols and comprehensive ethical guidelines to govern the use and handling of such sensitive data [4].

The ethical and legal landscape surrounding wearable health monitoring technologies is complex and requires diligent navigation. For forensic nursing, this involves engaging in crucial discussions regarding the principles of informed consent, definitively establishing data ownership rights, addressing the potential for misuse of highly sensitive health data, and actively working towards ensuring equitable access to these beneficial technologies, particularly for vulnerable trauma victims who may face additional barriers or be unable to provide informed consent [5].

A specialized narrative review focuses explicitly on the current state of wearable biosensors designed for monitoring trauma patients. This review highlights promising technologies capable of continuous physiological data collection, emphasizing their pivotal role in the early detection of patient deterioration. From a forensic perspective, these sophisticated sensors can furnish timestamped, objective evidence detailing a patient's condition immediately following a traumatic event, thereby providing essential data for accurate forensic reconstruction and precise causality assessments [6].

Critical data privacy and security issues are inherently associated with the use of wearable sensors in health monitoring, a concern that is paramount for forensic nursing. When dealing with the extremely sensitive patient data originating from trauma victims, understanding and mitigating these vulnerabilities is absolutely essential. This expertise is fundamental for meticulously maintaining the chain of custody, rigorously protecting patient privacy rights, and ultimately ensuring the legal integrity and defensibility of all collected information throughout the investigative process [7].

While not directly centered on trauma victims, a systematic review investigating the use of wearable devices for monitoring health and well-being in high-risk occupations provides valuable insights. This research offers an understanding of continuous monitoring in stressful and demanding environments, which can be highly relevant for comprehending an individual's baseline health status prior to a traumatic incident. It also sheds light on the unique challenges inherent in data collection within such demanding situations, lessons that are directly applicable to complex forensic evidence collection scenarios [8].

Another systematic review evaluates the efficacy of wearable sensors for non-invasive physiological monitoring specifically in acute care settings. This study underscores their remarkable utility in continuous data capture, which is an invaluable asset for forensic nurses. Such continuous data enables the documentation of the dynamic physiological responses of trauma victims in real-time, significantly aiding both immediate clinical care management and subsequent retrospective analysis for investigative and legal purposes [9].

Finally, a recent scoping review explores the expanding role of wearable sensors in prehospital and emergency settings, focusing on their utility in patient assessment, continuous monitoring, and overall management. For forensic nursing, this emphasizes the profound potential for early, objective data capture directly at the scene of trauma. This capability offers critical insights into the patient's initial physiological status and the immediate impact of injuries, information that can be absolutely vital for comprehensive evidence collection and subsequent meticulous forensic analysis [10].

Description

Wearable devices are emerging as powerful tools across emergency medical services (EMS) and trauma care, offering continuous, real-time physiological monitoring that significantly enhances patient assessment and management. These technologies provide crucial capabilities for establishing early warning systems, alerting clinicians to potential deterioration, and improving communication channels among healthcare providers [1]. The rich array of data collected, such as continuous heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and activity levels, allows for dynamic and objective tracking of a patient's condition from the initial stages of care through acute treatment. This continuous stream of objective information is invaluable, especially in the chaotic and high-stakes environment of emergency care, where swift and informed decisions can significantly impact patient outcomes. For forensic nursing, the application of these devices extends well beyond immediate clinical benefits, providing a robust and unassailable method for documenting initial patient states and collecting physiological data that can serve as compelling and objective evidence in legal contexts [3, 6, 9, 10]. A thorough understanding of the immediate post-trauma physiological responses, documented by these devices, is vital for accurate forensic reconstruction of events and precise causality assessments, enabling a clearer and more evidence-based picture of the incident and its direct impact on the individual [6].

The systematic review of wearable device utility in remote physiological monitoring of civilian trauma populations further highlights their profound potential to provide objective, continuous data critical for forensic investigations [2]. This encompasses the ability to track subtle or significant changes in patient status over extended periods, identify potential contributing factors to injuries that might not be immediately apparent, and precisely document the timing of medical interventions. Such detailed and verifiable information is instrumental in constructing a comprehensive timeline of events, which is often a cornerstone in complex medico-legal cases. Moreover, studies specifically on wearable biosensors for trauma patients underscore their pivotal role in the early detection of physiological deterioration, offering timestamped evidence of a patient's condition immediately following a traumatic event. This granular data becomes indispensable for retrospective analysis, offering objective insights into the dynamic physiological responses of trauma victims for investigative purposes, thereby bridging clinical care with forensic science [6, 9]. The application of these sensors also extends effectively to prehospital settings, where early, objective data capture directly at the scene of trauma can yield critical insights into initial physiological status and the immediate impact of injuries, serving as absolutely vital evidence for subsequent analysis [10].

However, the widespread integration of digital health technologies, including various forms of wearables, into both routine healthcare and specialized forensic practice introduces a complex array of legal and ethical considerations that demand meticulous attention and proactive management [4, 5]. Ensuring the absolute integrity of data and maintaining a strict, unbroken chain of custody are paramount when digitally collected health data is intended for use as evidence in legal proceedings, as any compromise can undermine its admissibility. The privacy of highly sensitive patient data, particularly from vulnerable trauma victims, must be rigorously protected against unauthorized access, use, or disclosure [7]. Furthermore, fundamental questions surrounding informed consent for data collection become central, especially in emergency situations where patients may be incapacitated or lack the capacity to provide consent. Determining clear data ownership and comprehensively addressing the potential for misuse of highly personal health information are critical ethical challenges that necessitate the development of clear, standardized guidelines and robust protocols [5]. These interwoven issues highlight the urgent necessity for strong legal frameworks and elevated professional ethical standards to govern the appropriate use and admissibility of wearable health data in forensic contexts.

Beyond the direct monitoring of acute trauma, valuable insights can be gleaned from the application of wearables in high-risk occupations. This research explores continuous monitoring in inherently stressful and demanding environments, offering a deeper understanding of an individual's baseline health before a traumatic event and shedding light on the unique challenges inherent in data collection within such rigorous situations [8]. These lessons are directly applicable to forensic evidence collection, where environmental factors, chronic stressors, and the initial health status of an individual can significantly influence the interpretation of injuries and subsequent physiological responses. Addressing data privacy and security issues comprehensively, therefore, is not merely a regulatory requirement but a fundamental ethical and professional obligation for forensic nursing practitioners. This ensures not only the legal integrity of collected information but also the paramount protection of the rights and dignity of trauma victims [7]. The proactive development of clear operational protocols, comprehensive ethical guidelines, and sophisticated, robust security measures is absolutely essential to harness the full, transformative potential of wearable technologies while simultaneously safeguarding patient rights and upholding the fundamental integrity of the justice system.

Conclusion

Wearable devices are profoundly impacting emergency medical services and trauma care by enabling real-time physiological monitoring, early warning systems, and improved communication. These technologies offer continuous, objective data capture, which is invaluable for documenting initial patient states and understanding the trajectory of acute trauma from its earliest stages [1, 3, 6, 9, 10]. For forensic nursing, this means enhanced capabilities for collecting objective physiological data as evidence, aiding in forensic investigations, causality assessments, and the precise timing of interventions [2, 6, 9]. However, the increasing reliance on digital health technologies introduces significant forensic, ethical, and legal challenges. Key concerns include ensuring data integrity, maintaining a strict chain of custody, and addressing patient privacy [4, 7]. Discussions around informed consent, data ownership, potential misuse of sensitive health data, and equitable access for vulnerable trauma victims are critical [5]. The unique challenges of data collection in demanding environments and the establishment of pre-trauma baselines from high-risk occupations also provide relevant context for forensic evidence [8]. Effectively leveraging these powerful tools requires comprehensive protocols, ethical guidelines, and robust security measures to ensure legal admissibility and protect patient rights [4, 5, 7]. The potential for wearables to provide timestamped, objective evidence of a patient's condition immediately following trauma underscores their transformative role in both clinical care and forensic analysis.

References

1. Nouf MA, Ahmad A, Abdulrahman FA (2023) .J Med Internet Res 25:e44721.

   , ,

2. Miriam W, Simon K, Michael CS (2022) .BMC Emerg Med 22:147.

   , ,

3. Faleh A, Abdulrahman AA, Raed A (2023) .Sensors (Basel) 23:5633.

   , ,

4. Graham S, David C, John SW (2021) .Forensic Sci Int Digit Investig 36:301221.

   , ,

5. Erik Z, Anna S, Florian W (2020) .J Med Ethics 46:282-289.

   , ,

6. Maisha Z, Tahsina T, Mohammad TR (2023) .Sensors (Basel) 23:7568.

   , ,

7. Brijesh S, Anil K, Anupam K (2022) .Comput Biol Med 149:105436.

   , ,

8. Justyna B, Piotr K, Patrycja K (2021) .Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:12003.

   , ,

9. Choy L, Min-Tzu S, Chia-Lin W (2020) .J Clin Monit Comput 34:937-952.

   , ,

10. Husam A, Yousef A, Abdulaziz A (2024) .Healthcare (Basel) 12:115.

    , ,